Yesterday, May 22nd, would have been Harvey Milk's 81st birthday. In San Francisco people held rallies and celebrations.
I and other activists against the recently passed "Sit/Lie" law held another Sidewalks are for People day. The Sit/Lie law makes it illegal to sit or lie on any public sidewalk between 7am and 11pm. It's illegal to sit on the curb while waiting for the bus, it's illegal to put a folding chair on the sidewalk to enjoy the sun and greet your neighbours, and it's illegal to sit down if you're holding a sidewalk sale, even if you're a child running a little lemonade stand.
Do you see those weird-looking things on the cop car around the lights? Those are surveillance cameras. I noticed this car (car 1272) driving very slowly around. I stopped and asked them about the devices on the roof.
You also find graffiti, much of it lame, some of it great. This piece is a black and red (heh) stencil, around a San Francisco Water Department access panel, poetically enough:
I picked up this collection of essays many years ago. I had read a few of the pieces here and there, but recently decided to read the whole thing through from front to back. I got a startling sense of time warp.I write this just two weeks after Osama bin Laden was assassinated by the United States, an event that seems anti-climactic, of an unimportance that would be astonishing to any time-traveler from nine or ten years ago. Already the story is fading from the news, subject only to occasional reverberations around discussion of the merits of torture or conspiracy theories that he is still alive. There is no indication that the US is any closer to ending its occupations of Iraq or Afghanistan, its wars in Libya or Pakistan, or its various military actions in other places across the world.
The Anti-Capitalism Reader, edited by Joel Schalit, was published in 2002, and many of the essays refer to the events of September 11th, 2001. Reading the interviews and analysis, you can feel the epochal status of 9/11 at that time, while now it has faded, representing only the turning point to the Dreary New Normal.
Predictably, it's seen from two angles: 1) libertarian - it's not the state's business to butt into people's relationships - and 2) support for same-sex marriage is "good for business" and would be part of New York state's "competitive advantage".
Later, on the way home, I ran into a friend of a friend who is a solid middle-class blue-collar worker, doing carpentry in the homes of the rich. He pointed out that the rich are often miserable. We talked for a while about how the system is so fucked up that even those who are "benefiting" from it, those who succeed by its rules, are often unhappy. In other words, even many elements of the ruling class are so unhappy under our current social system that they are amenable to a discussion about how we could organize our lives differently.
We don't envy the rich so much as we feel sorry for them. And we extend our hand to them, to join us in creating an entirely new world.
Update - 2011/05/16
I don't mean to imply that all rich people (or the party host) are unhappy. But I do think there is a pattern where unhappy people who aren't well-off can imagine that their unhappiness will be cured by money; if they succeed in becoming rich, and remain unhappy, they are at a loss for what the underlying problem could be. Even the "winners" in our society are often profoundly alienated.
I transcribed the Italian subtitles as best I could, doing some spell-checking and spot-checking with Google Translate. I hope to transcribe the French, which will take a lot more time, and from there attempt an English translation.
Johnson describes Priestley as "a lost Founding Father" of the United States - a friend of Ben Franklin, a major contributor to Thomas Jefferson's religious outlook, and a key figure in the controversy over the infamous Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798. He is most well known as one of the discoverers/inventors of oxygen, but Johnson spins his key discovery - that plants generate oxygen and make "bad" air good - as the start of ecosystem science. He was a famous scientist (or "natural philosopher") in his time, but also famous for his religious and political radicalism. The closest we might have to someone of his stature in our day is Noam Chomsky, who is a giant in the scientific field of linguistics and also a prolific writer on politics from a radical viewpoint.